Home

Facebook: A Social Toolbox

Leave a comment

By which I mean, it is full of Tools. In respons to some new Facebook terms and conditions, which I cannot be bothered to read, millions of aforementioned tools have been pasting the following text into Bookface:

In response to the new Facebook guidelines, I hereby declare that my copyright is attached to all of my personal details, status updates, messages, photos, videos, and all other personal content that I post online (as a result of the Berner Convention) on my personal profile page, anyone else’s page, or any business page. For commercial use of the above, my written consent is needed at all times.

Please note:

  • One cannot copyright one’s personal details. It makes no sense. Your name is not a work of art. It’s your bloody name.*
  • Your status updates are ideas, facts and opinions. You cannot copyright them**. Are you worries that Mark Zuckerberg is going to say he was in the shower when you were in the shower first?
  • You may be an established author or poet. If this is the case then why the hashtag would Facebook be your first point of publishing?!**
  • Messages… really? “Hi John, wanna go for a drink tomorrow? Love Clare xx” is not copyrightable, Sorry.
  • Photos and videos? If its a good photo or video, put your name on it. But I really don’t think Mr. Z is gonna try passing any of it off as his own.
  • When you post something on a business’ page, it is officially in the public domain. They are public pages… idiot. ∆∆

Oh and you can’t make legal statements in social media. Even if you could, it wouldn’t override the terms and conditions that you’ve already signed up to. Seriously people, pull yourselves together!

The reason Facebook needs to have rights to share your informations is because it’s a bloody networking site. Christ on a wooden cross!

In conclusion

The free service that Facebook provides me is frankly amazing. I hope they make a little bit of money by analysing my personal information and showing me adverts for pizza, dieting and debt relief.

Copyright Rattle Media 2012 ©, all rights reserved.***

P.S.

Feel free to name and shame any of said tools by mentioning them in the Facebook comments below ;-)

 

Corrections (following discussion below)

* Although not subject to copyright, personal details are subject to data protection laws

** Apparently you can as they are published text. Facebook shares a joint copyright that you have to agree to when signing up. Without it they couldn’t share data with your networks. If you were to publish a book or poem within a status update, your biggest concern should be people in your extended networks stealing it, not Facebook.

You own the copyright to photos and video that you create.

∆∆ Public domain is not the same as copyright-free. It does however mean that anyone can copy it and pass it off as their own. Protecting your art is your prerogative.

† Well technically you can… just don’t expect anyone to care. And it certainly won’t override the terms and conditions you have already signed up to.

*** See here

A Dam Relief: Did you forget?

Leave a comment

I have seen a couple of articles over the last year, embarrassingly sourced from kayakers, suggesting that the Bujagali Dam has made lives worse for local Ugandans.

Let’s forget, for the moment, that Uganda is a developing country; landlocked, not very windy, and without a Nuclear program. Let’s forget that it has one of the most powerful natural resources in the world flowing through it. Let’s even forget about the millions of inhabitants that are still without electricity and the fact hydropower is the only realistic option open to the country.

OK… have you forgotten all that? Then you probably also forgot that the dam only covered 10k of white water, that people displaced by the dam were relocated into houses that had power. You surely also forgot that BEL (Bujagali Electricity Ltd) has invested in local schools, hospitals, business centers, agriculture, reservation programs and tourism.

Forgotten all that as well? Did you forget that tourism is growing and not shrinking? That BEL has helped rafting companies set up facilities further downstream so that the rafting is still as amazing as ever?

You probably also forgot that kayaking is not, and will never be, the main source of employment and life-worth for Ugandans. But to put your mind at east, you’ll be happy to know that Kayak the Nile is doing great, especially since they now have a lake, in addition to a river, to operate on.

But lets be honest: all new power projects are going to come at some cost. To build a thing, one needs land to build on. Stopping a river changes local geography. Change is scary because it can, as has many times in the past, be handled carelessly.

That’s why, with the help of Simon Wood (Guerilla Films), we have collated hours of footage that documents all the positive effects, promoted by a strong social responsibility, that has been put back into the local community.

The public should always question the merits of a new project (hydropower, nuclear, fracking, etc…) but when reactionist journalism continues to rely on biased information given by ignorant kayakers, it’s frankly embarrassing.

The following three videos were all filmed after the construction of the Bujagali Dam. More will be coming over the next few months including a broader documentary about the changes.

The War on Nature

Leave a comment

Let’s not be coy about this life; all species are selfish. Humans with their apparent self-awareness, and much anecdotal evidence of free will, are arguably more selfish than others.

Like my brother and his obsession with Japanese Whaling, some humans do seem to genuinely care about nature for nature’s sake (i.e. anything that lives and is not human).

But if let’s be frank. These people are clearly insane. If we did genuinely care about nature then Adolf Hitler would be one of the great environmentalists, instigating the first major human cull of the 20th century.

No. It’s us or them. By which I mean it’s us (humans) against nature (things that are not human). And I am quite sure this position should hold up philosophically,at least until someone’s dog is able to articulate the rumour that they do in fact ‘just know’.

War, Hope and Meaning

My friend recently cited the fact that when a country goes to war it’s suicide rate drops. We’ve all heard this before and for the most part dismissed it as being a bit depressing.

But suicide, when not martyrdom, is usually a result of deep depression resulting from a complete loss of both hope and meaning. Remove one of these from the human psyche and the other will be hard to maintain.

I spent most of my teenage years in the late 90s and stood along the Thames when the clock struck midnight on December 1st 1999. I was born into a country and culture who’s existence had not been threatened since the end of the cold war.

By all accounts I should have appreciated such a privilege but in truth I was bitter. 90s children had no great struggle, no great war, and matters of social equality seemed to be bumbling along at an acceptable pace. We had all to fight for but no one to fight against.

Besides hoping that The Matrix was actually real, there was little to hope for. And as for meaning? Well you just had to make your own meaning. Maybe we could find it in religion, sex, drugs, sports, kayaking, video games, TV or pounding techno music.

Luckily in 2001 we were saved from our meaningless malaise by a wealthy Afghan (who recently passed away) and his bumbling American coke-head friend who let us into a very meaningful war on terror.

Note: There is also The War on drugs, War on poverty, War on porn, etc… but the War on Terror has been the most successful ‘War on’ franchise.

A New War

Well since the War on Terror seems to have somewhat lost its phazazz, we’ll probably need a new one soon. So following the popular theme of declaring war on things rather than people – and since we’re all now in agreement that culling badgers is better than culling cows because we neither eat or drink badger produce – I’d like to suggest that we officially declare War on Nature.

Now I’m not saying we all wonder guns blazing into the wilderness; it’s important that we all understand what what a war on nature means. I certainly don’t want to see teenagers wondering into the woods to kick the proverbial out of oak trees.

The war on nature has to be a tactical one. We should respect nature; not as a friend or neighbour, but as a worthy foe. And as Hurricane Sandy has demonstrated, she truly is.

No, we need to be clever if we are going to survive.

Let’s be honest: We have raped, pillaged and enslaved most of nature. In fact we have almost exhausted every possible method of extracting our energy from her. We even selectively breed some of its citizens into submissive furry companions just for our own amusement.

But nature does not want an unsustainable population of human vermin growing exponentially on inside her; that is becoming more and more clear.

So let us be honest as a species. We will do anything to survive, so long as there is a glimmer hope and meaning. Let’s recycle, because we don’t want to run out of stuff. Let’s save the Panda because they look cute and it’d be a hassle for the World Wildlife Fund to change their logo.

Let’s kill what we eat as humanely as possible because unlike nature we have a sense of fairness; we can feel guilt for harming others.

And one day we’ll leave this planet and go pillage another’s ecosystem, all in the name of survival. Only then will we be free from this ancient and bitter war.

A New Hope?

The War on Nature will be the biggest challenge the human race has ever faced. If we are to venture into the 21st century without fighting amongst ourselves, we must acknowledge who the real enemy is. She has always been. She is the destroyer of 97% of species that ever existed.

She is nature.

Log into Facebook to comment below…

The Race for Power and Global Stability

Leave a comment

If you are not a registered American voter you cannot vote for the US president, even though we know this decision will have implications for the whole world for decades to come.

But for the first time in human history, the whole world is directly or indirectly able to influence American politics.

When George Bush was reelected in 2004, the world stood by and watched helplessly; bemused and betrayed by the American populous. “FOUR MORE YEARS!” read one British headline, accompanied by images of war.

In 2008, America elected its first black president; an intellectual democrat that, longed for by the rest of the world but still we had no influence. Our world changed but not because Americans heard our plea.

Regardless of your views on socialised healthcare, it would not not exist in America if the British populous had not shouted out in defence of the NHS following a very public attack by Obama’s critics.

They claimed that, among other ridiculous things, the NHS was a breeding ground for terrorists.


Note how many dislikes this video has on YouTube.

My point is simply this: In 2009, British people influenced American policy by standing up for the social healthcare system that had been attacked. And America listened.

On January 18th 2012, Wikipedia (along with many other sites) instigated an online “blackout” in protest against US policy. Again, it was not just Americans who influenced that debate; and the people won that particular battle. SOPA and PIPA lost support and did not pass through congress.



Whatever your opinion on the subject of war, politics and America; I will finish with this:

At the beginning of World War 1, historians decided that “The Great War” – not the first to hold that title – needed no be named. In fact, at the time, World War 1 had many names.

Historians at the time decided to call it World War 1 for one simple reason:

Our descendants must understand that the history of the human race is the story of war.

Whoever US voters elect in 2012 will be involved in war. They will lead what is, for at least one more decade, the most powerful country on the planet.

But which type of war are you prepared to accept? And at what cost?

America – Please listen to all of us before casting that vote. We share a mutual destiny.

FOLLOW US ELECTION POLLING HERE

If you have nothing nice to say…

Leave a comment

Disclaimer: Strong language to follow…

A rule that I try to live my life by: If you have nothing nice to say then please just shut the fuck up. You are not contributing to the intellectual evolution of the human race; you are just inflicting your miserable attitude on other people who are trying to brighten your day.

My close friends will, and often do, complain about the amount of irrelevant information I post on Facebook. That’s fine; give me the criticism and I will listen. If it really bothers you, Facebook has given you many ways of unfollowing those information streams that are irrelevant to you.

You can also comment and complain publicly below posts that offend you.

Free and open discussion have driven evolution of human consciousness since the very basic beginnings in language.

Therefore: if your beliefs and morals are challenged, you are forced to either ignore the challenge or join the debate.

Adding a ‘DisLike’ button to Facebook posts will give people the ability to cop out of the debate. When you do this, your views go unheard. When opposing views go unheard, there is diminished opposition to the idea that offended you.

Case and Point?

Last week I shared a image that popped up on my Facebook timeline. For obvious reasons, it offended my elderly Jewish grandmother. See the following post and discussion:

Now… if she had the option to ‘DisLike’ my post, I would not have thought about why I offended her and the discussion that followed would not have happened. Whether you like it or not, discussion is the key to a free and open society. Discussion is how we learn how to understand each-other and get along.

Nan – I am sorry I offended you. I realise that, for you, this hits you hard on a very personal level and I understand why. But there are many young people who know nothing about the holocaust and this may be the first thing to ever get them thinking. That is the power of comedy.

Bullying

I am not even going to waist time going into detail here. It should be obvious that cyber-bullying is always going to be a problem for youths. So seriously – to all you miserable bastards out there who want to create another way for us to all gang up on those who do not fit in with what we think is “right” – get your heads out of your backsides; ignore, unfollow or discuss.

By clicking ‘DisLike’, you forfeit your right to have an opinion.

Rant over… Smiley face. LIKE.

 

I leave you alone for 1 week!

Leave a comment

Whenever I leave home, the UK goes bonkers. Just a quick brows of the web and I find Prince Charles reading the weather (Good way to promote the Union) and Borris has built a cable car over the Thames? What?!

Charles’ weather forcast

Borris’ Gondolas